Camera Scanning with Pixel Shift vs Flatbed Scanning

There Are Advantages to Using a Modern, Digital Camera with Pixel-shift Technology

There are potential advantages to using a modern, high-quality digital camera with pixel-shift technology (this usually requires a mirrorless camera) for scanning over a flatbed scanner, especially for larger formats like medium format film (120/220) or larger. However, it's best to consider both the pros and cons before you decide.

Potentially Higher Resolution: 

Pixel-shift technology captures multiple exposures with slightly shifted sensor positions, effectively achieving higher resolution than the camera's native sensor. This type of imaging can be particularly beneficial for high-detail negatives or slides. However, achieving truly high resolution requires precise alignment and vibration control, which is not difficult with modern cameras.

Dynamic Range & Noise Reduction: 

Modern cameras often have better dynamic range and noise performance than flatbed scanners, especially at higher ISOs. Such improvements can lead to cleaner, more detailed scans, especially for medium- and large-format film.

Greater Depth of Field: 

Cameras offer a deeper depth of field than flatbed scanners, allowing you to capture sharp focus over a larger area of the negatives/slides. This capability can be helpful for curved film or negatives with slight imperfections.

Versatility: 

You can use the same camera setup for various photography tasks beyond scanning, offering better value for money compared to a dedicated scanner which has only one purpose.

Time For Camera Scanning: 

The process can be much faster than flatbed scanning and more enjoyable. You will spend significantly less time waiting for the scans to finish, but a small amount of additional time will be required for post-editing.

Time For Flatbed Scanning: 

This can be tedious and time-consuming, especially for batches of negatives/slides; it can mean much waiting, as high-resolution scans take much longer. 

Technical Details:

Resolution: 

Flatbed scanners typically offer resolutions between 2400 and 4800 dpi (approximately equating to 23 megapixels), while some cameras can reach 50 megapixels and, with pixel shift, can achieve effective resolutions well beyond 150 megapixels, far exceeding flatbed scanners for medium and large formats.

High-Definition Benefits:

Higher resolution translates to clearer, sharper scans, allowing for larger prints or closer cropping without losing detail. Pixel-shifting can also improve color accuracy and reduce moiré patterns.

Important Considerations:

Setup Complexity: 

Camera scanning requires more setup with a macro lens, copy stand, and lighting. Flatbed scanners require only the time and knowledge of setting up the scanner and often wait a long time for it to complete.

Skill & Knowledge: 

Camera scanning requires more technical knowledge and skill than flatbed scanning, especially for alignment, levelling cameras and surfaces, and postprocessing.

Cost:

High-quality cameras with pixel-shift technology can be expensive if purchased new, while flatbed scanners range from affordable to very costly if you want the best.

Conclusion:

Whether camera scanning, especially with pixel shift, is better than flatbed scanning depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you need the highest resolution possible, especially for medium- or large-format film, and are pining for a more enjoyable and faster solution, camera scanning is worth exploring.

Next: Why Smartphones Are Unsuitable